On 20 May 2003, Richard Durbin wrote:
> Ah, sorry, this is really a hard limit in the current ACEDB code. We
> use 32 bits for a key for an object, 8 bits for the class and 24 for the
> index of an object in the class. It would be a very major restructuring
> to change this. You'll have to rethink your design I am afraid, or
> rewrite the acedb kernel from the ground up.
>THanks, I think redoing the data model will be the easier choice :-)
Another question: is support for raw data partitions (rather than files)
implemented? Does it hae any advantages for large data sets?