In article <dbrown-0708952212070001 at babymac.ear.ucalgary.ca>,
dbrown at haircell.ear.ucalgary.ca says...
>If you are
>interested in the formula it can be found in Newby HA (1979) Audiology.
>pp.157-159.
In that same book Newby makes some interesting comments about "Private
Practice Audiology." Once in awhile just for fun I reread this section of
his text. He didn't see much of a future for audiologists wanting to go into
private practice. I think he may have missed something.
In article <407vkr$1n6s at usenetp1.news.prodigy.com>, KVKY70A at prodigy.com
says...
>it has been my
>experience that a % of hearing loss is more often misleading than not to
>the patient.
In this world there are many of us (Carl Jung thought about 70% are in this
group) who like to see things in simple number-like terms. It does make it
easier for us to hear a number - any number - to describe our hearing loss.
However, what do you say to the person I saw today who has a mild loss with
lousy discrimination in one ear and a moderately-severe loss with good
discrimination in the other ear. A number (or percentage) really wouldn't
tell the story here!
Paul :-)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I don't know the answers, I just know the questions!
