> My guess is that bionet.software.sources hasn't taken off as much as
> we had hoped because it doesn't have a corresponding BIOSCI list ...
hmm ... but there are e-mail servers at U of H and EMBL for this
purpose. The USENET software.sources group has already been
criticized for excessive use of network bandwidth (although I think
this group is defensible against that charge). I'm not sure I would
feel the same way about adding a mailing list when servers are already