IUBio GIL .. BIOSCI/Bionet News .. Biosequences .. Software .. FTP

Scatchard Analysis Software

Peter Gegenheimer peterg at rnaworld.bio.ukans.edu
Thu Jan 5 19:18:43 EST 1995

In <3ehenh$fbr at lastactionhero.rs.itd.umich.edu>, Chris Beecher <cab at umich.edu> writes:
>I am looking for  PC or Mac software that can do a Scatchard analysis for
>at least one-site ligand binding experiments.
>I am already familair with Ligand and it barely gets by, can anyone
>recommend something better without spending an arm and a leg?
>chris beecher
>Univ of Mich

Ligand binding is not determined from a Scatchard plot but from least-squares 
non-linear regression fitting of the hyperbolic binding curve to the raw data 
(bound ligand vs total ligand).  For a simple example, see Chen et al, FEBS 
Lett.  298, 69-73 (1992).  Any sort of linear transformation of the data 
introduces statistical errors which make the results less reliable than direct 
curvefitting to the unmanipulated data.  This is especially true for a 
Scatchard plot, in which calculation of [free ligand] is often unreliable at 
very low [total ligand].  The *easiest* program for non-linear curvefitting is 
the old PC program Enzfitter (BioSoft; avail from Sigma and other scientific 
software distributors).  Enzfitter is expensive ($250-350) but lets you enter 
your own equations; it uses linear transforms, if possible, to obtain initial 
estimates for the non-linear curvefitting.  It also lets you adjust the type 
of robust weighting. It has excellent graphing capabilities; they require
work and are not publication-quality, but you can transfer everything to s 
simple plotting program for final figures if necessary. A slick (and $$) 
versions of this program are Graft-It for Windows, and Ultra-Fit for the Mac. 
Probably mush easier to use, but I haven't tried them.

The *cheapest* way is to use the freeware program Hyper (for Windows). It's 
available from ftp sites; I don't remember which one (maybe IUBio?) Hyper will
fit to the Michaelis-Menten equation, which is a plot of [bound ligand] vs 
[total ligand] for any ligand which is not a substrate. Hyper is excellent in 
that it also plot all the common linear transforms (Lineweaver-Burk; 
Eadie-Hofstee-Scatchard; Haines-Woolfe) to let you see how their answers 
differ from the true answer.

A compromise is to use any one of the many scientific graphing programs which 
have built-in non-linear curvefitting capabilities. SigmaPlot is one; PSI
Plot (only $50 academic) is my favorite. These curvefitters require a little 
work to set up the equations, especially if you want to use robust weighting.

If you can get the $, get Enzfitter or a similar program. You'll use it

|  Peter Gegenheimer            |  pgegen at kuhub.cc.ukans.edu             |
|  Departments of Biochemistry  |  voice: 913-864-3939                   |
|    and of Botany              |                                        |
|  University of Kansas         |  FAX  : 913-864-5321                   |
|  2045 Haworth Hall            | "The sleep of reason produces          |
|  Lawrence  KS  66045-2106     |  monsters."              Goya          |

More information about the Bio-soft mailing list

Send comments to us at archive@iubioarchive.bio.net