IUBio GIL .. BIOSCI/Bionet News .. Biosequences .. Software .. FTP

The Why Behind the Y Chromosome

Rcjohnsen rcjohnsen at aol.com
Wed May 24 16:59:31 EST 2000

The Why Behind the Y Chromosome

Gretchen Vogel

The human Y chromosome may be best known as a champion testosterone booster,
but its functional powers are puny compared to those of its partner, the X
chromosome: It is only one-third the size of the X and has only 1/100th as many
genes. Despite this mismatch, scientists have long suspected that the X and Y
were once equals, but they gradually diverged over time. Now, on page 964, two
researchers report evidence for how this split occurred.
In a kind of molecular-scale fossil dig, geneticists David Page of the
Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research at the Massachusetts Institute of
Technology and Bruce Lahn, now at the University of Chicago, analyzed genetic
"fragments of history"--genes still found on both chromosomes that have
remained relatively unchanged for millennia. They used these genetic relics to
piece together a rough history of how the chromosomes drifted apart. The
distinctions between X and Y didn't happen gradually, they concluded, but in a
stepwise fashion, implying that at least four distinct events--most likely
rearrangements of the Y chromosome--drove the chromosomes apart over hundreds
of millions of years.
"It's fascinating work," says geneticist Huntington Willard of Case Western
Reserve University School of Medicine in Cleveland. "It gives us an intriguing
glimpse" into the evolution of the human sex chromosomes. The work may also
shed light on the evolution of the sex chromosomes of birds and insects, which
developed independently of the mammalian system.
The mismatch between the X and Y chromosomes creates some unusual biology.
During the specialized cell division that creates sperm and eggs, most
chromosome pairs are able to line up and swap pieces, a process called
recombination. Like two friends who keep in touch despite being separated by
long distances, this occasional exchange keeps the pairs up to date with each
other. It also creates beneficial combinations of genes that can spread
throughout the population. But recombination won't work if the pairs are a poor
match, and in humans, the X and Y chromosomes recombine only at their tips.
Although X and Y look very different, in recent years geneticists have turned
up at least 19 genes that are present on both--all of them leftovers from the
days when the chromosomes were kept similar by recombination. Lahn and Page
scored each gene pair for sequence similarity, focusing on the number of
"synonymous" gene differences between them--changes in DNA that don't change
the protein's amino acid sequence. These mutations presumably are subject to
little selective pressure and accumulate randomly. Thus, as more time elapses,
more mutations should accrue. If so, the number of actual synonymous gene
changes should offer a rough estimate of the length of time that the genes have
been evolving independently, Page explains.
When the researchers looked at this value for different parts of the
chromosomes, they were "stunned," says Page. He wasn't expecting a clear
pattern, but in fact the values for genes on the X chromosome grouped into four
"strata" neatly arrayed along the chromosome's length. The genes on the
chromosome's long arm were most different from their Y counterparts, and as the
scientists examined the opposite end of the chromosome, the genes became more
and more similar to their Y doubles.
To explain this pattern, Lahn and Page propose that the Y chromosome was
reshuffled four times, perhaps through a process called inversion, in which a
piece of chromosome breaks off, flips over, and reattaches so the order of the
genes in that stretch is inverted. Each inversion prevented a stretch of the Y
from aligning and exchanging pieces with the matching piece on the X. After all
four inversions, the X and Y can now recombine only at their tips.
To get a rough estimate of when these inversions occurred, the scientists used
divergence times that are known from fossils and genetic evidence. For example,
two gene pairs in the fourth "stratum" of the X chromosome are still able to
recombine in prosimians but have diverged in both Old and New World monkeys, so
Lahn and Page estimated that the most recent reshuffling happened between 30
million and 50 million years ago, after monkeys diverged from prosimians but
before New and Old World monkeys split. In a similar way, they estimate that
the third inversion happened between 80 million and 130 million years ago and
the second between 130 million and 170 million years ago. But because only a
few genes remain similar in the oldest "layer," estimating the age of the first
rearrangement was tougher. So the scientists used the ages of the three
youngest strata as a rudimentary clock and concluded that the oldest section of
the chromosomes diverged between 240 million and 320 million years ago--shortly
after birds and mammals are thought to have split from their common,
reptile-like ancestor.
Such a scenario fits with the biology of animals today: Many reptiles lack
specific sex chromosomes (depending instead on temperature differences during
development to modulate individual sex-determining genes), and presumably the
reptilian ancestor of birds and mammals lacked sex chromosomes, too. In birds,
the avian sex chromosomes, W and Z, seem to be derived from the chromosome pair
that is today number nine in humans.
Indeed, "everything seems to fit together," says evolutionary biologist Brian
Charlesworth of the University of Edinburgh. The result is "really pleasing,"
agrees evolutionary biologist James Bull of the University of Texas, Austin,
and offers a surprisingly clear evolutionary record. Says Bull: "This is the
study that's going to go into the textbooks."

This article has been cited by other articles: 

*	Disteche, C. M. (1999). Escapees on the X chromosome. Proc. Natl. Acad.
Sci. U. S. A. 96: 14180-14182 [Full Text]   

Related articles in Science:

Four Evolutionary Strata on the Human X Chromosome.

Bruce T. Lahn and David C. Page 
Science 1999 286: 964-967. (in Reports) [Abstract] [Full Text] 

Ihave related article in PDF format if anyone wants it

Volume 286, Number 5441 Issue of 29 Oct 1999, pp. 877 - 879 
©1999 by The American Association for the Advancement of Science. 

Copyright © 1999 by the American Association for the Advancement of Science.   

More information about the Biochrom mailing list

Send comments to us at archive@iubioarchive.bio.net