IUBio GIL .. BIOSCI/Bionet News .. Biosequences .. Software .. FTP

Taking pictures of GFP

Wayne Forrester forrestr at mendel.berkeley.edu
Fri Jul 28 19:32:51 EST 1995

Hi Rebecca,
   What filter sets are you using to look at GFP? According to the Chalfie
paper describing gfp use as a reporter, excitation with short wavelength
light causes rapid bleaching. This is consistent with what I see. I
usually use two different filters for GFP. My favorite filter set, because
it gives a brighter signal, for looking at worms uses 400-440 excitation,
455 dichroic and ~470 long pass emission filter. I only use this filter
set with low magnification because when using it at high magnification I
get very rapid photobleaching. With a 40X dry objective the signal
bleaches in 20 to 30 seconds. When I change to a 100X oil objective the
signal bleaches in ~5 seconds. I switch to a FITC filter set (450-490
excitation, 510 dichroic and 520 long pass) for most photography. I am not
sure crossing into an Unc strain would help because the animals would
probably still move a little while you were exposing the film (I'm usually
using ~30 second exposures, although this can be reduced by using a faster
film). If they did move, obviously your pictures would be blurred. Also, I
see photobleaching even in the absence of azide, although it is less
rapid. I would just try a different filter set, which hopefully will take
care of your bleaching problem.
   Your second question is much more difficult to answer. I think in
practice, if one sees robust expression in a pattern that makes sense for
the gene in question, you tend to believe it. It's generally preferable to
confirm the expression pattern with antibody staining once that becomes
available. I think most reporter experiments are taken with a grain of
salt. Obviously, your mosaic analysis will help interpret the expression
pattern you see.
   Hope this helps. 
Wayne Forrester

More information about the Celegans mailing list

Send comments to us at archive@iubioarchive.bio.net