Shaun D. Black (shaun%jason.decnet at relay.the.ne) writes:
> I have had a curious experience recently with a publication. E-mail
> addresses were included in my methods section pertinent to some software
> suppliers. The publishers took out all of the e-mail addresses and only
> after 'coercion' was I able to get only two of them back in. Has any one else
> had this problem? If so, is there any consensus as to whether or not
> inclusion of e-mail addresses in publications (especially relative to
> methods) is appropriate/inappropriate? Thanks. -Shaun
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> = Shaun D. Black, PhD | Internet: shaun%jason.decnet at relay.the.net =
> = Dept. of Biochemistry | University of Texas Health Center, at Tyler =
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
I wanted the Email address in the address section, and the journal had to
be told a couple of times to leave it in ... and _I_ took the Email addresses
out of a methods section because between the submission of the paper and the
galleys the genbank FASTA/BLAST server had moved from IntelliGenetics to
NCBI ... a no win situation :-)
regards,
francis ouellette
(watch for new email address rsn ;)
