IUBio GIL .. BIOSCI/Bionet News .. Biosequences .. Software .. FTP

Interoperability - subject classification/terminology

Stevan Harnad harnad at ecs.soton.ac.uk
Sat Nov 15 16:03:01 EST 2003


On Sat, 15 Nov 2003, Prof. Tom Wilson wrote:

> Stevan Harnad says:
> 
>s> Please remember that most researchers currently search their abstracts databases
>s> and their toll-access journal content databases without the help of any subject
>s> classification taxonomies. This will continue to be the case for the open-access
>s> full-text database, once it grows to a significant size. Journal articles --
>s> especially when they include inverted full-text -- are not, and never
>s> were, searched via prepackaged subject classifications or taxonomies
>s> or aggregations.

> I think that Stevan is a little too sweeping in his generalisation here. In the 
> days before machine searching, pretty well all abstracting journals were 
> organized according to some subject specific classification scheme: Chemical 
> Abstracts, Metallurgical Abstracts, Nuclear Science Abstracts are among those I 
> searched on behalf of scientists in that dim and distant past. At that time 
> users certainly relied upon those classification schemes to help them to reduce 
> the volume of material they needed to search. 

I agree completely. But we are now in the days of machine searching, done by the
researchers themselves, for themselves, google-style. When search is restricted to
the inverted full-text corpus of the annual 2.5 million articles published in the
planet's 24,000 refereed journals, there is no need whatsoever to rely on
classification schemes.
http://www.eprints.org/self-faq/#26.Classification

> Those classification schemes 
> continue today in the print versions and online versions generally offer the 
> possibility of a search by class.

Yes, but does anyone bother to use them (online)?

> The debate about the cheapness of simplistic 
> Boolean searching (which puts the costs on the user to disentangle the useful 
> from the useless) versus the cost (to the producer) of high quality subject 
> indexing and classification has never been settled - and doubtless never will 
> be.

But one thing is sure: It is irrelevant to the issue of open access, and certainly
not something to wait for!

Stevan Harnad

> ___________________________________________________
> Professor T.D. Wilson, PhD
> Publisher/Editor in Chief
> Information Research
> InformationR.net
> University of Sheffield
> Sheffield S10 2TN,  UK
> e-mail: t.d.wilson at shef.ac.uk
> Web site: http://InformationR.net/
> ___________________________________________________ 
> 




More information about the Jrnlnote mailing list

Send comments to us at archive@iubioarchive.bio.net