Dear Don,
I just finished compiling those figures for Manitoba:
MRC eligible 337
MRC funded 73 22%
NSERC eligible 417
NSERC funded 211 51%
This includes all presently active awards, not just those made this
year.
Maybe we should stop funding bird brains?
Yours, -Dick
>Dear Dick,
> Yes, 72% unfunded looks bad, but I suspect many of them have some
>funding from other sources and are looking to the MRC for more funds, or
>are even looking for a second MRC grant. The 28% may not reapply again for
>3-5 years, so it may be the SAME 72% which gets, rejected, "competition"
>after "competition" (me included). Better figures for evaluative purposes
>would be the percentage of total MRC eligible researchers who are actually
>unfunded (a) from any source, and (b) from the MRC.
> As for Alex's wondering why the 72% appear not to be incommoded
>by the MRC's adverse decision, I suspect that many of them (like most
>members of the MRC itself) have never given deep thought to the rationale
>of the process by which funds are assigned. One commentator would compare
>their knowledge in this area to a bird's knowledge of aerodynamics.
>>Regards, Donald Forsdyke
>>http://post.queensu.ca/~forsdyke/peerrev.htm