I would be willing to bring my contribution, but I would need more info on
what would be expected from us and on what periodicity basis.
Kind regards,
Robert Ancuceanu
*Robert Ancuceanu, RPh, PhDFaculty of PharmacyUniversity of Medicine and
Pharmacy “Carol Davila”, BucharestMy university:
http://www.umfcaroldavila.ro/ <http://www.umfcaroldavila.ro/>My department:
http://www.botanica-farmaceutica.ro/ <http://www.botanica-farmaceutica.ro/>
My freelancer website: www.regaffairs.ro <http://www.regaffairs.ro>My
Romanian blog: http://ancuceanu.wordpress.com/
<http://ancuceanu.wordpress.com/>My English blog:
http://ancuceanu.blogspot.ro/ <http://ancuceanu.blogspot.ro/> Phone:
+40737139588*
*If you want to go fast, go alone; if you want to go far, go together. (An
African proverb).*
*This message is intended solely for the designated recipient(s). It may
contain confidential or proprietary information and may be subject to
attorney-client privilege or other confidentiality protections. If you are
not a designated recipient you may not review, copy or distribute this
message. If you receive this in error, please notify the sender by reply
e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.P Please consider the environment
before printing this email*
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 7:19 PM, <forsdyke from queensu.ca> wrote:
> When I initiated bionet.journals.note with the support of various
> publishing houses in 1994 I had high hopes. Unfortunately, I was unable to
> monitor and reject junk postings and, as can be viewed here, the quality
> and frequency of postings have deteriorated over the years. However, in
> case you are new to this area, please note that some of the aspired
> functions of bionet.journals.note can now be found in the pages of The
> Scholarly Kitchen, which is run by folk connected with the publishing
> industry, and is carefully monitored.
>> The publishing industry has also established COPE (Committee on
> Publication Ethics), which, as its title suggests, also has the potential
> to serve some of the aspired functions of bionet.journals.note.
>> Another promising avenue was provided by PubMed Commons that was
> established by the NCBI (National Center for Biological Information at the
> NIH, USA) in 2013. This allowed post-publication peer-review by certified,
> non-anonymous, volunteers from the scientific community. Unfortunately,
> after 5 years of often quite excellent postings, recently this fell by the
> wayside. A promising replacement that is slowly evolving is PubPeer, which
> is privately funded, requires no certification, and allows anonymity.
>> Nevertheless, it would be nice if there were someone out there who might
> reinvigorate bionet.journals.note and establish a board of monitors, who
> might take turns in monitoring postings.
>> Donald R. Forsdyke,
> Department of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences,
> Queen's University, Canada
> _______________________________________________
> Jrnlnote mailing list
>Jrnlnote from net.bio.net>http://www.bio.net/biomail/listinfo/jrnlnote>-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.bio.net/bionet/mm/jrnlnote/attachments/20180412/66dd9a12/attachment.html
