Mail*Link(r) SMTP Mac vs DOS
The University of Melbourne has a lot of experience in this area. The best
contact is Michael Nott (michael_nott at mac.unimelb.edu.au). Jenny Sasse
...............................
Can anyone offer an objective, non-prejudicial appraisal of what one should be
purchasing in setting up a computer lab for biology?
Or data collection to integrate into the biology laboratory?
Is the best of both worlds a dual platform Mac (with DOS card)?
Does anyone have a vision of what will be most useful for CD ROM materials
(Mac vs DOS) in the future?
Are there any reviews that anyone is aware of that addresses this issue?
We're needing to make some decisions associated with a major building project.
Our present computer inventory (none diedicated to the natural sciences) is
virtually all DOS-based hardware, but there is a contingent that really thinks
Macs are better.
Jim Perry
Campus Dean and Associate Prof of Biological Sciences
University of Wisconsin Center - Fox Valley
Midway Road at University Drive, PO Box 8002
Menasha, WI 54952-8002
414-832-2610
jperry at uwcamil.uwc.edu
------------------ RFC822 Header Follows ------------------
Received: by muwayf.unimelb.edu.au with SMTP;19 Oct 1995 08:21:54 U
Received: from net.bio.net by muwayb.ucs.unimelb.edu.au (PMDF V5.0-5 #7200)
id <01HWM9312XDC0058IN at muwayb.ucs.unimelb.edu.au> for
jenny_sasse at muwayf.unimelb.edu.au; Thu, 19 Oct 1995 08:21:50 +1000
Received: (from daemon at localhost) by net.bio.net (8.6.12/8.6.6)
id MAA28697 for plant-ed-list; Wed, 18 Oct 1995 12:06:38 -0700
Received: (from news at localhost) by net.bio.net (8.6.12/8.6.6)
id MAA28686 for plant-ed-arpanet; Wed, 18 Oct 1995 12:06:32 -0700
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 1995 12:06:19 -0700
From: jperry at uwcmail.uwc.edu
Subject: Mac vs DOS
Sender: daemon at net.bio.net
To: plant-ed at net.bio.net
Message-id: <199510181905.MAA28651 at net.bio.net>
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
NNTP-posting-host: net.bio.net
