IUBio GIL .. BIOSCI/Bionet News .. Biosequences .. Software .. FTP

(none)

farishg at CC4.ADAMS.EDU farishg at CC4.ADAMS.EDU
Fri Feb 21 19:32:51 EST 1997


>From farishg Fri Feb 21 18:08:34 0700 1997 remote from cc4.adams.edu
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 1997 18:08:34 -0700 (MST)
From: Guy Farish <farishg at cc4.adams.edu>
To: plant-ed at net.bio.net
Subject: www use
Message-ID: <Pine.SV4.3.91.970221174848.4310A-100000 at cc4.adams.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: from cc4.adams.edu by cc4.adams.edu; Fri, 21 Feb 1997 18:08 MST
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Length: 1861

Plant-edders,

No Ross, I'm not against use of the www, nor use of the information in 
various pages in student reports or other types of work.  I just think 
it's premature to cite them as if they were refereed sources.  I don't 
bother to check most citations, unless they come from a journal with a 
very unfamiliar title, or the author of the paper makes some statement 
that I find hard to believe.  Then I try to check to see if the student 
has misinterpreted the source or taken something out of context so that I 
can help them become better critical readers of the literature.

The case of the missing web page was from a student who had some pretty 
grand ideas and little concept of the difference between data and 
speculation.  He cited some hard copy sources and what appeared to be 
reputable web pages, and some with pretty off the wall names. A couple of 
these pages were really trash and some were no longer available.  The 
problem is that students tend to lack the experience and sophistication 
to distinguish between legitimate sources and slick presentations of 
junk.  I agree, they need to learn how to do this, but the web has the 
same fascination to them as TV, if it's there, it must be true.

I think we need to explain to them the power and potential of the web, 
and also the pitfalls as others have said.  Until there is a method in 
place to referee web page publications, I think the citations should take 
into account the ephemeral nature and they should be treated like 
personal communications or something similar.  Our students today are the 
researchers of tomorrow, and as someone else pointed out the journals are 
not yet accepting URL's as citations.  Why should we be any different? 
Just my humble opinion.

Guy Farish
Biology Department
Adams State College
Alamosa, CO 81102
(719) 587-7969 FAX (719) 587-7242




More information about the Plant-ed mailing list

Send comments to us at archive@iubioarchive.bio.net