Dear Jon and other plant-edders,
Jon's willingness to moderate this group is certainly appreciated.
However, I would not like to see us get locked into a moderated group by a
constitutional change. Could we modify the Constitution to make the
choice of moderating be up to the moderator so that if means for filtering
spams improves we don't have to go back to a vote? Subscribers to these
lists seem to be so appreciative of the moderators that they are willing
to accept what the moderator deems best, so why not make that the rule.
Do others agree?
Janice
***********************************
Janice M. Glime, Professor
Department of Biological Sciences
Michigan Technological University
Houghton, MI 49931-1295
jmglime at mtu.edu
906-487-2546
FAX 906-487-3167
***********************************
