IUBio GIL .. BIOSCI/Bionet News .. Biosequences .. Software .. FTP

Fungi and its fragmentary fossil history

Bill Purves purves at THUBAN.AC.HMC.EDU
Mon Nov 15 05:29:11 EST 1999


Colleen Feucht inquired:

>I have a question about the history of fungi.  Scientists today believe 
>fungi are more closely related to animals than they are to plants.  
>Characteristics of this group seperate it into it's own kingdom.  Is it 
>possible that fungi are the first animals to evolve on our planet?  Does 
>anyone have any thoughts on this subject?
>
>Coleen Feucht
>FSU

It would be incorrect to say that fungi are/were the first animals.
The fungi are sister to the animals.  Both kingdoms are monophyletic.
No fungus was an animal, and no animal was a fungus.

However, the fungi and animals share an ancestor that was NOT ancestral
to plants.  I hope this is of some use, Colleen.

(bill)


William K. Purves      Vice President/Editorial Director
The Mona Group LLC                     West Coast Office
2817 N. Mountain Avenue              phone: 909.626.4859   
Claremont, CA 91711-1550               fax: 909.626.7030
              e-mail: purves at monagroup.com
           http://www2.hmc.edu/bio/purves.html
                http://www.monagroup.com
________________________________________________________





More information about the Plant-ed mailing list

Send comments to us at archive@iubioarchive.bio.net