IUBio GIL .. BIOSCI/Bionet News .. Biosequences .. Software .. FTP


ROOSSINCK,MARILYN roossinck at aardvark.ucs.uoknor.edu
Thu Oct 6 19:32:00 EST 1994

In article <199410041405.KAA26159 at hobbes>, ogston at HOBBES.KZOO.EDU (Walter Ogston) writes...
>Ed Rybicki makes a comment about evolution of negative strand viruses,
>to the effect that what has evolved must be advantageous because it has
>evolved.  The problem with this proposition is that it is circular, and
>doesn't explain anything interesting.  Nothing against Ed, lots of
>people have done the same thing.  
>The real challenge for the evolutionary biologist is to explain why a
>particular structure or system favors the survival and replication (or
>reproduction) of the organisms that posess it.  Comparison with
>alternatives is important here.  And ideally the explanation should 
>lead to an experiment or observation that will test the explanatory 
>In the case of negative strand viruses, one significant difference from 
>positive strand viruses is that the former can express several different 
>mRNAs on infection, at different levels, whereas the latter can express 
>only one mRNA, and in order to separate different genetic functions early 
>in infection they have to go through the business of separating the
>components of the polyprotein.  
>Furtiher development of this argument is left as an exercise to the
>Walter Ogston				ogston at hobbes.kzoo.edu

Actually, (+) sense viruses can express several mRNAs early, by using divided
genomes, a fairly common strategy in the plant viruses.  They also often use
subgenomic promoters for timed expression.

M.J. Roossinck
S.R. Noble Foundation

More information about the Virology mailing list

Send comments to us at archive@iubioarchive.bio.net