IUBio GIL .. BIOSCI/Bionet News .. Biosequences .. Software .. FTP

HIV<>AIDS are no longer on sci.med.aids

bhjelle at unm.edu bhjelle at unm.edu
Tue Oct 18 13:01:46 EST 1994

In article <37uv7v$nrt at www.interramp.com>,  <pp000165 at interramp.com> wrote:
>Brian: But it was you who originally said, unless I am
>mistaken, that the elisa hiv test can give false +s 98%
>of the time? in  the context of testing donor blood from
>your blood bank? 

So? This is, contrary to what one might conclude from
a casual glance, completely compatible with the HIV
test being one of the best tests ever invented. This
concept is not very easily transmitted with a few sentences
on the Net, and requires some relatively advanced 
understanding of the theory behind diagnostic testing.
In an exceedingly low-prevalence setting (such as repeat
blood donors to a blood bank from a relatively low
HIV-prevalence area, who are also extensively screened for
high-risk behaviors), a test with 99+% sensitivity
and 99%+ specificity can *still* produce many more false
positives than true positives. The same is true of
any diagnostic test that is not perfect (in other words,
all of them).


More information about the Virology mailing list

Send comments to us at archive@iubioarchive.bio.net